The world’s oldest form of racism was on display in New York City yesterday, as the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) rallied in support of Hamas and its vicious assault on Israel:
Hundreds of pro-Palestinian demonstrators, organized by the Democratic Socialists of America, rallied Sunday in the Big Apple—stomping on and burning the Israeli flag—as Islamic terrorists in the Gaza Strip continued their assault on the Jewish state.
One attendee in the pro-Palestinian camp was pictured holding up an image of a swastika on their phone—a day after 700 Jews were slaughtered by Hamas.
It may well be asked how an indiscriminate slaughter of unarmed civilians at an outdoor concert furthers the cause of freedom for “Palestine.” And what does it tell us about the nature of Palestinian nationalism that the naked corpse of a dead young Jewish woman was paraded through the streets of Gaza City, to be cheered and spat upon by the mob? If atrocities like that offer a preview of the future Palestinian state, the world can do without it. We already have North Korea, China, Russia, Iran and more.
The pro-Hamas demonstrations that broke out in New York and other cities in the United States, Canada and elsewhere were also horrifying evidence that some people in the West—people calling themselves enlightened and progressive—have in fact devolved, reaching back into history, resurrecting an old, old hatred, incorporating it into their postmodern ideology.
That progressives have embraced genocidal Palestinian nationalism is one of the sinister ironies of our age. They call it “anti-Zionism,” but that is a lie. What pro-Palestinian progressives espouse is antisemitism, plain and simple. They may rave and rant about “imperialism,” “white supremacy,” “colonialism,” etc. But those words signify nothing, for to support or make excuses for the barbaric actions of Hamas gives evidence of antisemitism as clear and unambiguous as hoisting the Nazi flag.
Sad to say, some of these enlightened, progressive people serve in the Congress of the United States. Over the weekend, Representative Rashida Tlaib, Democrat of Michigan and a rabid antisemite, released a statement to the effect that Israel’s “apartheid government” was responsible for the “suffering” to which Hamas was offering “resistance.” Hitler took a similar line, arguing that the eradication of the Jews was, for the German people, a necessary measure of self-defense. Both Tlaib and Representative Cori Bush, another Jew basher, demanded an end to US aid for Israel. All this was too much for their Democratic colleagues, a number of whom denounced Talib and Bush’s statements as “repulsive”—as indeed they were.
Tlaib and Bush are members of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s progressive Squad. AOC’s contribution to the dialogue was a demand for Israel to agree to an immediate ceasefire and de-escalation—this after a terrorist attack on Israel six or seven times worse, proportionately, than America’s 9/11. Is that not sufficient evidence of AOC’s antisemitism, and another sign of the virus that permeates the progressive wing of the Democratic Party? That these horrible people, these apologists for terror, are tolerated in the ranks of the party is a shame and a scandal.
Progressive antisemitism is rooted in a narrative of the conflict between the Palestinian Arabs and the Jews that portrays the former as noble victims and the latter as colonial exploiters and fascists. The word apartheid is much bandied about. When one recalls that progressives make extravagant claims on behalf of their intellectual superiority, such blather would be hilarious if there were not, as of this writing, around 1,000 dead with many more wounded, almost all of them Jews, thanks to the Hamas attack.
The comrades portray Hamas’ home base, the Gaza Strip, as a kind of ghetto in which two million Palestinians are penned up, prevented from leaving by Israeli bayonets. Nothing could be further from the truth. Gaza along with the rest of Palestine belonged to the Ottoman Empire until 1919, and it became part of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1920. After the Israeli War of Independence, Gaza came under Egyptian military occupation, and it was formally annexed by Egypt in 1959. The territory passed under Israeli control after the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. Most of its inhabitants are descendants of Palestinian refugees who fled or were expelled from Israel during the Independence War.
Up to 2005, many Jews lived in Gaza. But as a concession to the Palestinians, the Israeli prime minister of the day, Ariel Sharon, proposed the abandonment of these settlements in 2003. This measure was approved by the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, in 2004, and the evacuation was carried out in 2005. In total, 24,000 Jewish settlers were moved out of Gaza. Those who resisted were forcibly removed by Israeli security forces.
Since 2005, therefore, there has been no Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip. And there would be no blockade of Gaza today had not the Palestinian population elected Hamas to govern them. Hamas turned Gaza into a terrorist base, and the people living there into human shields. This explains why both Israel and Egypt blockade their borders with Gaza: to keep a pack of bloodthirsty terrorists at bay. Apartheid has nothing to do with the matter. It’s the presence of Hamas in Gaza that keeps the population penned under lock and key.
Its refusal to take cognizance of these facts is emblematic of the progressive Left’s attitude toward Israel and the Jews. That attitude may be described as a rationalized hatred, and it afflicts the comrades with a curious blind spot: They simply fail to perceive how their activism appears to others, cannot see that a comparison of their pro-Hamas demonstrations with the scenes of horror and slaughter in southern Israel makes the former appear despicable in the eyes of every decent person. Peace! Justice! the demonstrators cry. Peace? The peace of the grave? Justice? For whom—the murderers of the innocent?
But now that the mask has dropped to reveal the ugly, sneering face of the postmodern progressive Left, it’s clear what the comrades really mean when they speak of peace, justice, equality. They mean: Pogrom, Kristallnacht, Judenrein.
Sweden: Jews Call for Ban on Nordic Resistance Movement . . .
❝I ALWAYS LIKE to take note of Jewish organisations calling for bans on immigration resistance parties. You could say “Why bother? We’re surrounded by Jews screeching for White Genocide in various, usually artfully disguised, ways. This is just another twig on the bonfire.”
This is true. But arguments about the JQ and its relationship to White minoritization are open to various kinds of objection. You can quote this or that Jewish journalist calling for open borders or abolishing White people. Objection? “It’s just one guy; no proof he’s representative of anything other than himself; besides, he’s making a legitimate argument that’s open to democratic debate.”
That is why calls for bans on political parties assume a special moral significance. It’s a demand for the suppression of debate. And when it comes from an organization that claims to be representative of Jewry, and that claim goes unchallenged, then a special moral culpability attaches to the Jews.❞
https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/03/sweden-jews-call-for-ban-on-nordic-resistance-movement/
FUCK YOU AND YOUR JEWISH GOD, YOU FILTHY KIKESUCKING ZIONIST ASS WHORE . . .
❝. . . the entire establishment in the Western world is attacking Russia in unison. The propaganda machine is in full swing in an effort to make the whole world hate Putin and take Ukraine’s side in the war. The same propaganda machine that wants nothing more than you as a White person to stop having children and instead focus on your career, race-mix or become homosexual. What this establishment wants you to think is often a very good indicator of what you should absolutely not think, and by this measure, Russia appears to be the side to support 100%.
From a global geopolitical perspective, if we theorize from the unlikely idea that this conflict will lead to a third world war, then all pro-Zionist liberal monster-nations like Great Britain, France, Germany, the United States and, of course, Israel itself would side with Ukraine, while more traditional and sovereign anti-Zionist forces would likely stand behind Russia. Mark my words when I say that the Nordic Resistance Movement will NEVER stand on the same side as Israel or the Zionist entity that the USA represents today – whatever the issue or conflict may be!
If we look at the situation from a revolutionary point of view, it is also natural to support Russia. By challenging the USA and the Western world, one acts against the status quo – the present situation that must be destroyed in order for any true changes to take place, and for us National Socialists to be able to make real progress. The more the current ruling powers are challenged, and the harder the world economy is combated, the greater the chance for widespread disruption, which is a necessity for the Nordic revolution to become fact. Please note that I do not mean the coming changes will necessarily be better for us; however, in the dramatic situation in which we find ourselves, we must see hope in every potential radical change that arises within the global environment.❞
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/which-side-are-we-on-in-the-ukraine-war/